Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum All-Subkeys-Recovery Attacks on 6-round Feistel-2* Structure Based on Multi-Equations Quantum Claw Finding
arXiv
Authors: Wenjie Liu, Mengting Wang, Zixian Li
Year
2023
Paper ID
54502
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
155
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Exploiting quantum mechanisms, quantum attacks have the potential ability to break the cipher structure. Recently, Ito et al. proposed a quantum attack on Feistel-2* structure (Ito et al.'s attack) based onthe Q2 model. However, it is not realistic since the quantum oracle needs to be accessed by the adversary, and the data complexityis high. To solve this problem, a quantum all-subkeys-recovery (ASR) attack based on multi-equations quantum claw-finding is proposed, which takes a more realistic model, the Q1 model, as the scenario, and only requires 3 plain-ciphertext pairs to quickly crack the 6-round Feistel-2* structure. First, we proposed a multi-equations quantum claw-finding algorithm to solve the claw problem of finding multiple equations. In addition, Grover's algorithm is used to speedup the rest subkeys recovery. Compared with Ito et al.'s attack, the data complexity of our attack is reduced from O2n to O(1), while the time complexity and memory complexity are also significantly reduced.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Exploiting quantum mechanisms, quantum attacks have the potential ability to break the cipher structure.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.