Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning Quantum Chemistry

Representations and descriptors unifying the study of molecular and bulk systems

Crossref
Authors: Kevin Rossi, James Cumby

Year

2019

Paper ID

5433

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

81

Citations

N/A

Abstract

AbstractEstablishing a unified framework for describing the structures of molecular and periodic systems is a long‐standing challenge in physics, chemistry, and material science. With the rise of machine learning methods in these fields, there is a growing need for such a method. This perspective aims to discuss the development and use of three promising approaches—topological, atom‐density, and symmetry‐based—for the prediction and rationalization of physical, chemical, and mechanical properties of atomistic systems across different scales and compositions.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • AbstractEstablishing a unified framework for describing the structures of molecular and periodic systems is a long‐standing challenge in physics, chemistry, and material science.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #5433 #69042 Simultaneous Fragment Docking f... #69037 Spin dynamics and ortho-para co... #69034 Hardware-aware Low-latency Quan... #69025 Machine-Learning Optimization a...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.