Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Foundations
Three-body Entanglement in Particle Decays
arXiv
Authors: Kazuki Sakurai, Michael Spannowsky
Year
2023
Paper ID
54218
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
102
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum entanglement has long served as a foundational pillar in understanding quantum mechanics, with a predominant focus on two-particle systems. We extend the study of entanglement into the realm of three-body decays, offering a more intricate understanding of quantum correlations. We introduce a novel approach for three-particle systems by utilising the principles of entanglement monotone concurrence and the monogamy property. Our findings highlight the potential of studying deviations from the Standard Model and emphasise its significance in particle phenomenology. This work paves the way for new insights into particle physics through multi-particle quantum entanglement, particularly in decays of heavy fermions and hadrons.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum entanglement has long served as a foundational pillar in understanding quantum mechanics, with a predominant focus on two-particle systems.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.