Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Quantum Simulation
A Multi-Band Temperature Measurement Data Retrieval Method Based on the Chaotic Artificial Hummingbird Algorithm (CAHA).
PubMed
Authors: You W, Hao X, Jia R, Pei P, Feng S, Wang X
Year
2026
Paper ID
51997
Status
Peer-reviewed
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
143
Citations
N/A
Abstract
To address the challenges of data processing caused by uncertain emissivity in multispectral radiation thermometry, this paper proposes a temperature retrieval method based on the Chaotic Artificial Hummingbird Algorithm (CAHA). Without relying on an assumed emissivity model, the method can automatically identify the emissivity distribution and selects the optimal output through multiple iterations to enhance accuracy. Simulations and offline tests conducted on rocket nozzles demonstrate that CAHA maintains high accuracy both in noise-free conditions and under 5% noise, with a single execution time of approximately 0.15 s. Furthermore, the method is validated through experiments on blackbody sources and candle flames: the relative error in retrieved temperature for blackbody sources remains below 0.93%, while the retrieved outer flame temperature of candle flames shows a relative error of 0.66% compared with thermocouple measurements. Combining high precision with rapid computation, this method is suitable for practical applications in radiation thermometry.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- To address the challenges of data processing caused by uncertain emissivity in multispectral radiation thermometry, this paper proposes a temperature retrieval method based on...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.