Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Minimal representations of topology-preserving quantum-like states
arXiv
Authors: William Horvat, Debadrita Saha, Nicolás Gigena, Prineha Narang, Gregory D. Scholes
Year
2026
Paper ID
81856
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
93
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We provide an equitable partition that gives an exact, minimal representation for the graph Cartesian product formed from quantum-like bits that preserves the relevant spectral and topological properties. We show that this result follows from the fact that the operations of taking the Cartesian product of graphs and constructing equitable partition of the graphs commute. Numerical simulations illustrate the preserved emergent eigenstates in the reduced structures. Additionally, we provide a construction of the minimal structure without passing through the Cartesian product. Finally, we frame quantum-like structures in the language of topology and fibrations.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We provide an equitable partition that gives an exact, minimal representation for the graph Cartesian product formed from quantum-like bits that preserves the relevant spectral...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.