Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Simulation Quantum Chemistry

On the relationship between the strength of bonding between topological atoms and the exchange‐correlation energy

Crossref
Authors: Aleksei A. Anisimov, Ivan V. Ananyev

Year

2022

Paper ID

5160

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

75

Citations

7

Abstract

AbstractThe titled relationship is considered in this paper in terms of the (de)localization phenomenon and its emanation in the positional coordinate space. The similarity between the strength of bonding of a topological atom (in the sense of the population of the corresponding atomic surface) and the delocalization index is discussed. Based on the hypervirial theorem, a scalar one‐particle field is suggested to visualize the consequences of (de)localization for the formation of bonding.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2022 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • AbstractThe titled relationship is considered in this paper in terms of the (de)localization phenomenon and its emanation in the positional coordinate space.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #5160 #78797 Local polarization control of o... #78792 Demonstration of subspace-searc... #78846 Analog quantum simulation of Sh... #78837 TLS loss in superconducting res...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-10-23 09:59:45

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.