Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum State Preparation Representation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Compiling Any mathsf{MIP}* into a (Succinct) Classical Interactive Argument
arXiv
Authors: Andrew Huang, Yael Tauman Kalai
Year
2025
Paper ID
51457
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
189
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present a generic compiler that converts any mathsf{MIP}* protocol into a succinct interactive argument where the communication and the verifier are classical, and where post-quantum soundness relies on the post-quantum sub-exponential hardness of the Learning with Errors $mathsf{LWE}$ problem. Prior to this work, such a compiler for mathsf{MIP}* was given by Kalai, Lombardi, Vaikuntanathan and Yang (STOC 2022), but the post-quantum soundness of this compiler is still under investigation. More generally, our compiler can be applied to any mathsf{QIP} protocol which is sound only against semi-malicious provers that follow the prescribed protocol, but with possibly malicious initial state. Our compiler consists of two steps. We first show that if a language mathcal{L} has a mathsf{QIP} with semi-malicious soundness, where the prover runs in time T, then mathcal{L} in mathsf{QMATIME}(T). Then we construct a succinct classical argument for any such language, where the communication complexity grows polylogarithmically with T, under the post-quantum sub-exponential hardness of mathsf{LWE}. Note: After this work was finished, an independent and concurrent work (Baroni et al. 2025) resolved the question of quantum soundness of the KLVY compiler.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present a generic compiler that converts any mathsfMIP^* protocol into a succinct interactive argument where the communication and the verifier are classical, and where...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.