Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Simulation Quantum Chemistry

Optimizing VQE Ansatz for Studying Tight-Binding Models with sd-Interaction and On-Site Coulomb Repulsion

arXiv
Authors: Oleg Udalov

Year

2025

Paper ID

51423

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

78

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The VQE algorithm is applied to the problem of finding the ground state of a lattice model with on-site Coulomb repulsion, nearest-neighbor hopping, and on-site sd-interaction. We compare the performance of several ansatze, including cluster and generic forms. Several modifications of the standard cluster ansatz implementation are proposed, which significantly reduce the number of two-qubit gates. Different classical optimizers are employed within the VQE algorithm. The performance of the algorithms is evaluated using both noiseless and noisy simulations.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The VQE algorithm is applied to the problem of finding the ground state of a lattice model with on-site Coulomb repulsion, nearest-neighbor hopping, and on-site sd-interaction.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #51423 #68971 On solutions of the Schrödinger... #69042 Simultaneous Fragment Docking f... #69041 Multi-modes Bessel-Gaussian-Orb... #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.