!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Chemistry
Digital adiabatic evolution is universally accurate
arXiv
Authors: Yangyu Lu, Yifei Huang, Dong An, Qi Zhao, Dingshun Lv, Xiao Yuan
Year
2025
Paper ID
51261
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
151
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Adiabatic evolution is a central paradigm in quantum physics. Digital simulations of adiabatic processes are generally viewed as costly, since algorithmic errors typically accumulate over the long evolution time, requiring exceptionally deep circuits to maintain accuracy. This work demonstrates that digital adiabatic evolution is intrinsically accurate and robust to simulation errors. We analyze two Hamiltonian simulation methods - Trotterization and generalized quantum signal processing - and prove that the simulation error does not increase with time. Numerical simulations of molecular systems and linear equations confirm the theory, revealing that digital adiabatic evolution is substantially more efficient than previously assumed. Remarkably, our estimation for the first-order Trotterization error can be 10^6 times tighter than previous analyses for the transverse field Ising model even with less than 6 qubits. The findings establish fundamental robustness of digital adiabatic evolution and provide a basis for accurate, efficient implementations on fault-tolerant - and potentially near-term - quantum platforms.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Adiabatic evolution is a central paradigm in quantum physics.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.