Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum State Preparation Representation
Quantum Entropy Information Measures
Quantum Simulation
Dyson Indices and Hilbert-Schmidt Separability Functions and Probabilities
arXiv
Authors: Paul B. Slater
Year
2007
Paper ID
50460
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
162
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A confluence of numerical and theoretical results leads us to conjecture that the Hilbert-Schmidt separability probabilities of the 15- and 9-dimensional convex sets of complex and real two-qubit states (representable by 4 x 4 density matrices rho) are 8/33 and 8/17, respectively. Central to our reasoning are the modifications of two ansatze, recently advanced (quant-ph/0609006), involving incomplete beta functions B_{nu}(a,b), where nu= rho11 rho44/rho22 rho33. We, now, set the separability function S_{real}(nu) propto B_{nu}(nu,1/2},2) =(2/3) (3-nu) sqrt{nu}. Then, in the complex case - conforming to a pattern we find, manifesting the Dyson indices (1, 2, 4) of random matrix theory-- we take S_{complex}(nu) propto S_{real}^{2} (nu). We also investigate the real and complex qubit-qutrit cases. Now, there are two Bloore ratio variables, nu_{1}= rho11 rho55rho22 rho44, nu_{2}= rho22 rho66rho33 rho55, but they appear to remarkably coalesce into the product, eta = nu_1 nu_2 = rho_{11} ρ_{66}}{ρ_{33} ρ_{44}}, so that the real and complex separability functions are again univariate in nature.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A confluence of numerical and theoretical results leads us to conjecture that the Hilbert-Schmidt separability probabilities of the 15- and 9-dimensional convex sets of complex...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.