Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Experimental indication of anomalous sensitivity in many-body systems: Deterministic randomness in complex quantum collisions?
arXiv
Authors: Qi Wang, Jian-Long Han, Yu-Chuan Dong, Song-Lin Li, Li-Min Duan, Hu-Shan Xu, Hua-Gen Xu, Ruo-Fu Chen, He-Yu Wu, Zhen Bai, Zhi-Chang Li, Xiu-Qin Lu, Kui Zhao, Jian-Cheng Liu, Guo-Ji Xu, S. Yu. Kun
Year
2007
Paper ID
50118
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
87
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We have experimentally tested a recently suggested possibility for anomalous sensitivity of the cross sections of dissipative heavy ion collisions. Cross sections for the 19F+27Al dissipative collisions were measured at the fixed energy 118.75 MeV of the 19F for the 12 different beam spots on the same target foil. The data demonstrate dramatic differences between the cross sections for the different beam spots. The effect may indicate deterministic randomness in complex quantum collisions. New experiments are highly desirable in a view of the fundamental importance of the problem.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We have experimentally tested a recently suggested possibility for anomalous sensitivity of the cross sections of dissipative heavy ion collisions.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.