Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Chemistry

A simple method for characterization of the magnetic field in an ion trap using Be+ ions

arXiv
Authors: Jianwei Shen, Andrii Borodin, Stephan Schiller

Year

2014

Paper ID

47124

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

113

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We demonstrate a simple method for the determination of the magnetic field in an ion trap using laser-cooled Be+ ions. The method is not based on magnetic resonance and thus does not require delivering radiofrequency (RF) radiation to the trap. Instead, stimulated Raman spectroscopy is used, and only an easily generated optical sideband of the laser cooling wave is required. The d.c. magnetic vector, averaged over the Be+ ion ensemble, is determined. Furthermore, the field strength can be minimized and an upper limit for the field gradient can be determined. The resolution of the method is 0.04 G at present. The relevance for precision rovibrational spectroscopy of molecular hydrogen ions is briefly discussed.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We demonstrate a simple method for the determination of the magnetic field in an ion trap using laser-cooled Be+ ions.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #47124 #69012 Projector Quantum Variational A... #69006 Elucidating the Control of Circ... #69042 Simultaneous Fragment Docking f... #69039 SAT, MaxSAT, and SMT for QLDPC ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.