You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Foundations
A hidden-variables version of Gisin's theorem
arXiv
Authors: Kazuo Fujikawa, Koichiro Umetsu
Year
2014
Paper ID
47110
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
160
Citations
N/A
Abstract
It is generally assumed that {\em local realism} represented by a noncontextual and local hidden-variables model in d=4 such as the one used by Bell always gives rise to CHSH inequality |langle Brangle|leq 2. On the other hand, the contraposition of Gisin's theorem states that the inequality |langle Brangle|leq 2 for arbitrary parameters implies (pure) separable quantum states. The fact that local realism can describe only pure separable quantum states is naturally established in hidden-variables models, and it is quantified by G\({bf a},{bf b}\)= 4\[langle ψ|P\({bf a}\)otimes P\({bf b}\)|ψrangle-langle ψ|P\({bf a}\)otimes{bf 1}|ψranglelangle ψ|{bf 1}otimes P\({bf b}\)|ψrangle\]=0 for any two projection operators P\({bf a}\) and P\({bf b}\). The test of local realism by the deviation of G\({bf a},{bf b}\) from G\({bf a},{bf b}\)=0 is shown to be very efficient using the past experimental setup of Aspect and his collaborators in 1981.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- It is generally assumed that em local realism represented by a noncontextual and local hidden-variables model in d=4 such as the one used by Bell always gives rise to CHSH...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.