!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Spin Qubits Silicon Quantum Computing Quantum Simulation Quantum Sensing Metrology

Programmable graphene nanobubbles with three-fold symmetric pseudo-magnetic fields

DOAJ
Authors: Pengfei Jia, Wenjing Chen, Jiabin Qiao, Miao Zhang, Xiaohu Zheng, Zhongying Xue, Rongda Liang, Chuanshan Tian, Lin He, Zengfeng Di, Xi Wang

Year

2019

Paper ID

4705

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

45

Citations

116

Abstract

Presence of nano-bubbles within an atomically thin material generates potentially large pseudo-magnetic fields. Here, the authors report an innovative technique to induce nano-bubbles in graphene with desirable features and high precision through energized AFM tips, and experimentally measure three-fold symmetric pseudo-magnetic fields up to 120 T.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Presence of nano-bubbles within an atomically thin material generates potentially large pseudo-magnetic fields.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #4705 #78846 Analog quantum simulation of Sh... #78810 Secure Quantum Handshakes: Quan... #78802 Quantum Co-Design of Inhomogene... #78801 Constructing Large and Structur...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-10-22 17:17:46

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.