Quick Navigation

Topics

Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Quantum State Preparation Representation Quantum Simulation Quantum Foundations

Even quantum pigeons may thrive together. A note on 'the quantum pigeonhole principle'

arXiv
Authors: B. E. Y. Svensson

Year

2014

Paper ID

46162

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

77

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The findings in the paper 'The quantum pigeonhole principle and the nature of quantum correlations', (arXiv 1407.3194), by Aharonov, Colombo, Popescu, Sabadini, Struppa and Tollaksen are scrutinized. I argue that some of the conclusions in the paper are ambiguous in the sense that they depend on the precise way one defines correlations, and that the 'first experiments' the authors suggest has little if any bearing on their main theses. The far-reaching conclusions the authors reach seems, therefore, premature.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2014 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The findings in the paper 'The quantum pigeonhole principle and the nature of quantum correlations', (arXiv 1407.3194), by Aharonov, Colombo, Popescu, Sabadini, Struppa and...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #46162 #68426 On the Approximate Non-Determin... #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ... #68413 Emergent Operational Entangleme... #68474 Concentration-Free Quantum Kern...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.