Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Chemistry
When is randomization advantageous in quantum simulation?
arXiv
Authors: Francesco Paganelli, Michele Grossi, Andrea Giachero, Thomas E. O'Brien, Oriel Kiss
Year
2026
Paper ID
45430
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
158
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the regimes in which Hamiltonian simulation benefits from randomization. We introduce a sparse-QSVT construction based on composite stochastic decompositions, where dominant terms are treated deterministically and smaller contributions are sampled stochastically. Crucially, we analyze how stochastic and approximation errors propagate through block-encoding and QSVT procedures. To benchmark this approach, we construct ensembles of random Hamiltonians with controlled coefficient dispersion, locality, and number of terms, designed to favor randomization, and therefore providing an upper bound on its practical advantage. For Hamiltonians with many terms and highly inhomogeneous coefficient distributions, randomized methods reduce gate counts by up to an order of magnitude. However, this advantage is confined to moderate-precision regimes: as the target error decreases, deterministic methods become more efficient, with a crossover near varepsilon sim 10-3. Although this regime partially overlaps with quantum chemistry Hamiltonians, realistic systems exhibit additional structure, such as commutation patterns, not captured by our model, which are expected to further favor deterministic approaches.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the regimes in which Hamiltonian simulation benefits from randomization.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.