Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Simulation

Quantum reservoir networks based on decoherence-free subspaces

arXiv
Authors: V. V. Akshay, M. V. Altaisky, N. E. Kaputkina

Year

2026

Paper ID

68457

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

82

Citations

0

Abstract

We present numerical simulation of a six-qubit quantum reservoir network with an output implemented on a 5-dimensional decoherence-free subspace (DFS), working as a classifier between entangled and product states of the input quantum system, fed to the reservoir during a finite learning time. Since the dynamics of DFS is not affected by external fluctuations, no cooling is required, and the proposed model seems a promising candidate for future quantum artificial intelligence systems working at room temperatures and free of huge energy consumption.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We present numerical simulation of a six-qubit quantum reservoir network with an output implemented on a 5-dimensional decoherence-free subspace (DFS), working as a classifier...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #68457 #68474 Concentration-Free Quantum Kern... #68452 Sample-efficient benchmarking o... #68434 Lowering LCU Circuit Width thro... #68416 Ancilla-Efficient QSAMPLE Prepa...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-07 03:55:39

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.