Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Projective Simulation with Hamiltonian Evolution: A study in reinforcement learning
arXiv
Authors: Amara Katabarwa, Nima Karimatari
Year
2017
Paper ID
44280
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
138
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Projective Simulation was introduced as a novel approach to Artificial Intelligence. It involves a deliberation procedure that consists of a random walk on a graph of clips and allows for the learning agent to project itself into the future before committing to an action. Here we study and analyze a quantum mechanical version in which the random walk is performed by two kinds of Hamiltonians. The first kind is implemented by naively embedding the classical model in a quantum model by turning the clips into qubits. The other allows for storing clips in superpositions of qubits allowing for a potentially purely quantum mechanical learning procedure in which the perception of the environment is purely quantum mechanical but the action is classical. We lastly introduce the concept of interacting projective agents for both the classical and quantum mechanical case.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Projective Simulation was introduced as a novel approach to Artificial Intelligence.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.