You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Foundations Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations Quantum Entropy Information Measures Quantum Simulation

Time Symmetric Quantum Theory Without Retrocausality? A Reply to Tim Maudlin

arXiv
Authors: Matthew S. Leifer

Year

2017

Paper ID

44035

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

95

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In arXiv:1707.08641, Tim Maudlin claims to construct a counterexample to the result of Proc. Roy. Soc. A vol. 473, iss. 2202, 2017 (arXiv:1607.07871), in which it was shown that no realist model satisfying a certain notion of time-symmetry (in addition to three other assumptions) can reproduce the predictions of quantum theory without retrocausality (influences travelling backwards in time). In this comment, I explain why Maudlin's model is not a counterexample because it does not satisfy our time-symmetry assumption. I also explain why Maudlin's claim that one of the Lemmas we used in our proof is incorrect is wrong.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2017 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In arXiv:1707.08641, Tim Maudlin claims to construct a counterexample to the result of Proc.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #44035 #69027 Computational Superiority of No... #69013 Quantum correlations and cohere... #68993 Tomography of quantum states wi... #68981 Affine Filtering Measurements a...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.