Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Simulation
Signatures of many-body localisation in the dynamics of two-sites entanglement
arXiv
Authors: Fernando Iemini, Angelo Russomanno, Davide Rossini, Antonello Scardicchio, Rosario Fazio
Year
2016
Paper ID
43879
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
153
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We are able to detect clear signatures of dephasing - a distinct trait of Many-Body Localisation (MBL) - via the dynamics of two-sites entanglement, quantified through the concurrence. Using the protocol implemented in \[Science {\bf 349}, 842 (2015)\] we show that - in the MBL phase - the average two-site entanglement decays in time as a power law, while in the Anderson localised phase it tends to a plateau. The exponent of the power law is not universal and shows a clear dependence on the strength of the interaction. This behaviour is also qualitatively different in the ergodic phase where the two-site entanglement decays exponentially. All the results are obtained by means of time-dependent density matrix renormalisation group simulations; they are corroborated by analytical calculations on an effective model. Two-site entanglement has been already measured in cold atoms: Our analysis paves the way for the first direct experimental test of many-body dephasing in the MBL phase.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We are able to detect clear signatures of dephasing - a distinct trait of Many-Body Localisation (MBL) - via the dynamics of two-sites entanglement, quantified through the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.