Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Scaling theory of the Anderson transition in random graphs: ergodicity and universality
arXiv
Authors: Ignacio García-Mata, Olivier Giraud, Bertrand Georgeot, John Martin, Rémy Dubertrand, Gabriel Lemarié
Year
2016
Paper ID
43658
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
120
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the Anderson transition on a generic model of random graphs with a tunable branching parameter 1<Kle 2, through large scale numerical simulations and finite-size scaling analysis. We find that a single transition separates a localized phase from an unusual delocalized phase which is ergodic at large scales but strongly non-ergodic at smaller scales. In the critical regime, multifractal wavefunctions are located on few branches of the graph. Different scaling laws apply on both sides of the transition: a scaling with the linear size of the system on the localized side, and an unusual volumic scaling on the delocalized side. The critical scalings and exponents are independent of the branching parameter, which strongly supports the universality of our results.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the Anderson transition on a generic model of random graphs with a tunable branching parameter 1
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.