Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Speed Limit Bounds in an Open Quantum Evolution
arXiv
Authors: Nicolás Mirkin, Fabricio Toscano, Diego A. Wisniacki
Year
2016
Paper ID
43567
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
131
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum mechanics dictates bounds for the minimal evolution time between predetermined initial and final states. Several of these Quantum Speed Limit (QSL) bounds were derived for non-unitary dynamics using different approaches. Here, we perform a systematic analysis of the most common QSL bounds in the damped Jaynes-Cummings model, covering the Markovian and non-Markovian regime. We show that only one of the analysed bounds cleaves to the essence of the QSL theory outlined in the pioneer works of Mandelstam & Tamm and Margolus & Levitin in the context of unitary evolutions. We also show that all of QSL bounds analysed reflect the fact that in our model non-Markovian effects speed up the quantum evolution. However, it is not possible to infer the Markovian or non-Markovian behaviour of the dynamics only analysing the QSL bounds.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum mechanics dictates bounds for the minimal evolution time between predetermined initial and final states.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.