!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
An effected process on finite statistical fluctuation analysis for decoy-state measurement device-independent quantum key distribution
arXiv
Authors: Su-Tong Shi, Fen-Zhuo Guo
Year
2016
Paper ID
42954
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
112
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this paper, we consider the decoy-state Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum key distribution (MDI-QKD) with four intensities. The average value of successful events and bit errors among the pulse pair set be used to investigate the successful events of different pulses under the statistical fluctuation caused by the finite condition. We demonstrate that the lower bound of successful events number n11estimated by our method can be more tight than the result in [28]. Numerical simulations show that our estimation method can achieve a higher key rate than existing methods with a relatively weak constraints of experimental devices, such as high dark count rate and low detection efficiency of detectors when data size is N = 109.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this paper, we consider the decoy-state Measurement-Device-Independent Quantum key distribution (MDI-QKD) with four intensities.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.