Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Foundations
How Kirkwood and Probability Distributions Differ: A Coxian Perspective
arXiv
Authors: Kevin Vanslette
Year
2016
Paper ID
42163
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
153
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Kolmogorov's first axiom of probability is probability takes values between 0 and 1; however, in Cox's derivation of probability having a maximum value of unity is arbitrary since he derives probability as a tool to rank degrees of plausibility. Probability can then be used to make inferences in instances of incomplete information, which is the foundation of Baysian probability theory. This article formulates a rule, which if obeyed, allows probability to take complex values and still be consistent with the interpretation of probability theory as being a tool to rank plausibility. It is then shown that Kirkwood distributions and the conditional complex probability distributions proposed by Hofmann do not obey this rule and therefore cannot rank plausibility. Not only do these quasiprobability distributions relax Kolmogorov's first axiom of probability, they also are void of the defining property of a probability distribution from a Coxian and Baysian perspective - they lack the ability to rank plausibility.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Kolmogorov's first axiom of probability is probability takes values between 0 and 1; however, in Cox's derivation of probability having a maximum value of unity is arbitrary...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.