Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Quantum Thermodynamics
Detector Readout of Analog Quantum Simulators
arXiv
Authors: Lin Tian, Iris Schwenk, Michael Marthaler
Year
2016
Paper ID
41654
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
117
Citations
N/A
Abstract
An important step in quantum simulation is to measure the many-body correlations of the simulated model. For a practical quantum simulator composed of finite number of qubits and cavities, in contrast to ideal many-body systems in the thermodynamic limit, a measurement device can generate strong backaction on the simulator, which could prevent the accurate readout of the correlation functions. Here we calculate the readout of a detector coupled to an analog quantum simulator. We show that reliable characterization of the many-body correlations in the simulator can be achieved when the coupling operators obey the Wick's theorem. Our results are illustrated with two examples: a simulator for an harmonic oscillator and a simulator for the free electron gas.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2016 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- An important step in quantum simulation is to measure the many-body correlations of the simulated model.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.