Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Simulation Quantum Foundations

Optimality of Lindblad unfolding in measurement phase transitions

arXiv
Authors: Michael Kolodrubetz

Year

2021

Paper ID

41389

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

97

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Entanglement phase transitions in hybrid quantum circuits describe individual quantum trajectories rather than the measurement-averaged ensemble, despite the fact that results of measurements are not conventionally used for feedback. Here, we numerically demonstrate that a class of generalized measurements with identical measurement-averaged dynamics give different phases and phase transitions. We show that measurement-averaged destruction of Bell state entanglement is a useful proxy for determining which hybrid circuit yields the lowest-entanglement dynamics. We use this to argue that no unfolding of our model can avoid a volume law phase, which has implications for simulation of open quantum systems.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Entanglement phase transitions in hybrid quantum circuits describe individual quantum trajectories rather than the measurement-averaged ensemble, despite the fact that results...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #41389 #78846 Analog quantum simulation of Sh... #78817 Modelling Josephson Junctions w... #78814 Construction of isoscattering n... #78811 Autonomous Code Migration for Q...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.