Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Local integrals of motion detection of localization-protected topological order
arXiv
Authors: Thorsten B. Wahl, Florian Venn, Benjamin Béri
Year
2021
Paper ID
41377
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
103
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Many-body-localized (MBL) phases can be topologically distinct, but distinguishing these phases using order parameters can be challenging. Here we show how topologically distinct local integrals of motion, variationally parametrized by quantum circuits, can be used to numerically demonstrate the topological inequivalence of MBL phases. We illustrate our approach on a fermionic chain where both topologically distinct MBL phases and benchmark comparisons to order parameters are possible. We also use our approach, augmented by the DMRG-X algorithm, to extract high-energy topological doublets. We describe applying our methods to higher dimensions to identify MBL topological order and topological multiplets hidden by the dense many-body spectrum.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Many-body-localized (MBL) phases can be topologically distinct, but distinguishing these phases using order parameters can be challenging.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.