Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Quantum process tomography of adiabatic and superadiabatic stimulated Raman passage
arXiv
Authors: Shruti Dogra, Gheorghe Sorin Paraoanu
Year
2021
Paper ID
41350
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
92
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum control methods for three-level systems have become recently an important direction of research in quantum information science and technology. Here we present numerical simulations using realistic experimental parameters for quantum process tomography in STIRAP (stimulated Raman adiabatic passage) and saSTIRAP (superadiabatic STIRAP). Specifically, we identify a suitable basis in the operator space as the identity operator together with the 8 Gell-Mann operators, and we calculate the corresponding process matrices, which have 9times 9=81 elements. We discuss these results for the ideal decoherence-free case, as well as for the experimentally-relevant case with decoherence included.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum control methods for three-level systems have become recently an important direction of research in quantum information science and technology.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.