!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Circuit Design Gate Engineering Quantum Simulation Quantum State Preparation Representation Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Conjectured DXZ decompositions of a unitary matrix

arXiv
Authors: Alexis De Vos, Martin Idel, Stijn De Baerdemacker

Year

2021

Paper ID

41099

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

76

Citations

N/A

Abstract

For any unitary matrix there exists a ZXZ decomposition, according to a theorem by Idel and Wolf. For any even-dimensional unitary matrix there exists a block-ZXZ decomposition, according to a theorem by Führ and Rzeszotnik. We conjecture that these two decompositions are merely special cases of a set of decompositions, one for every divisor of the matrix dimension. For lack of a proof, we provide an iterative Sinkhorn algorithm to find an approximate numerical decomposition.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • For any unitary matrix there exists a ZXZ decomposition, according to a theorem by Idel and Wolf.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #41099 #78846 Analog quantum simulation of Sh... #78810 Secure Quantum Handshakes: Quan... #78802 Quantum Co-Design of Inhomogene... #78801 Constructing Large and Structur...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.