Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Optimization

Analog Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

arXiv
Authors: Nancy Barraza, Gabriel Alvarado Barrios, Jie Peng, Lucas Lamata, Enrique Solano, Francisco Albarrán-Arriagada

Year

2021

Paper ID

40666

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

87

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We present an analog version of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm suitable for current quantum annealers. The central idea of this algorithm is to optimize the schedule function, which defines the adiabatic evolution. It is achieved by choosing a suitable parametrization of the schedule function based on interpolation methods for a fixed time, with the potential to generate any function. This algorithm provides an approximate result of optimization problems that may be developed during the coherence time of current quantum annealers on their way toward quantum advantage.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We present an analog version of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm suitable for current quantum annealers.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #40666 #69042 Simultaneous Fragment Docking f... #69036 CARVE-Q: Quantum-Proposed, Clas... #69000 Performance analysis of classic... #68991 Benchmarking Quantum Algorithmi...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.