Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Estimating the spectral density of unstable scars
arXiv
Authors: Domenico Lippolis
Year
2021
Paper ID
40090
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
108
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In quantum chaos, the spectral statistics generally follows the predictions of Random Matrix Theory (RMT). A notable exception is given by scar states, that enhance probability density around unstable periodic orbits of the classical system, therefore causing significant deviations of the spectral density from RMT expectations. In this work, the problem is considered of both RMT-ruled and scarred chaotic systems coupled to an opening. In particular, predictions are derived for the spectral density of a chaotic Hamiltonian scattering into a single- or multiple channels. The results are tested on paradigmatic quantum chaotic maps on a torus. The present report develops the intuitions previously sketched in [D. Lippolis, EPL 126 (2019) 10003].
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2021 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In quantum chaos, the spectral statistics generally follows the predictions of Random Matrix Theory (RMT).
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.