Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Additive-error fine-grained quantum supremacy
arXiv
Authors: Tomoyuki Morimae, Suguru Tamaki
Year
2019
Paper ID
39899
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
132
Citations
N/A
Abstract
It is known that several sub-universal quantum computing models, such as the IQP model, the Boson sampling model, the one-clean qubit model, and the random circuit model, cannot be classically simulated in polynomial time under certain conjectures in classical complexity theory. Recently, these results have been improved to "fine-grained" versions where even exponential-time classical simulations are excluded assuming certain classical fine-grained complexity conjectures. All these fine-grained results are, however, about the hardness of strong simulations or multiplicative-error sampling. It was open whether any fine-grained quantum supremacy result can be shown for additive-error sampling. In this paper, we show the additive-error fine-grained quantum supremacy. As examples, we consider the IQP model, a mixture of the IQP model and log-depth Boolean circuits, and Clifford+T circuits. Similar results should hold for other sub-universal models.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- It is known that several sub-universal quantum computing models, such as the IQP model, the Boson sampling model, the one-clean qubit model, and the random circuit model...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.