Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Simulation

Quantum statistical signature of mathcal{PT} symmetry breaking

arXiv
Authors: Stefano Longhi

Year

2019

Paper ID

39830

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

128

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In multiparticle quantum interference, bosons show rather generally the tendency to bunch together, while fermions can not. This behavior, which is rooted in the different statistics of the particles, results in a higher coincidence rate P for fermions than for bosons, i.e. P(bos)<P(ferm). However, in lossy systems such a general rule can be violated because bosons can avoid lossy regions. Here it is shown that, in a rather general optical system showing passive parity-time $mathcal{PT}$ symmetry, at the mathcal{PT} symmetry breaking phase transition point the coincidence probabilities for bosons and fermions are equalized, while in the broken mathcal{PT} phase the reversal P(bos)>P(ferm) is observed. Such effect is exemplified by considering the passive mathcal{PT}-symmetric optical directional coupler.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2019 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In multiparticle quantum interference, bosons show rather generally the tendency to bunch together, while fermions can not.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #39830 #78846 Analog quantum simulation of Sh... #78810 Secure Quantum Handshakes: Quan... #78802 Quantum Co-Design of Inhomogene... #78801 Constructing Large and Structur...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.