Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Compilation Routing Architecture
Benchmarking Verification Validation
Quantum Gate Fidelity Benchmarking
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Measurement-Free Ancilla Recycling via Blind Reset: A Cross-Platform Study on Superconducting and Trapped-Ion Processors
arXiv
Authors: Sangkeum Lee
Year
2026
Paper ID
39153
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
149
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Ancilla reuse in repeated syndrome extraction couples reset quality to logical-cycle latency. We evaluate blind reset - unitary-only recycling via scaled sequence replay - on IQM Garnet, Rigetti Ankaa-3, and IonQ under matched seeds, sequence lengths, and shot budgets. Using ancilla cleanliness F_clean=P(|0>), per-cycle latency, and a distance-3 repetition-code logical-error proxy, platform-calibrated simulation identifies candidate regions where blind reset cuts cycle latency by up to 38x under NVQLink-class feedback overhead while maintaining F_clean >= 0.86 for L <= 6. Hardware experiments on IQM Garnet confirm blind-reset cleanliness >= 0.84 at L=8 (1024 shots, seed 42); platform-calibrated simulation for Rigetti Ankaa-3 predicts comparable performance. Architecture-dependent crossover lengths are L* 12 (IQM), 11 (Rigetti), 1 (IonQ), and 78 with GPU-linked external feedback. Two added analyses tighten deployment boundaries: a T1/T2 sensitivity map identifies coherence-ratio regimes, and error-bound validation confirms measured cleanliness remains consistent with the predicted diagnostic envelope. A deployment decision matrix translates these results into backend-specific policy selection.
Paper Tools
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.