Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Compilation Routing Architecture Benchmarking Verification Validation Quantum Gate Fidelity Benchmarking Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance

Measurement-Free Ancilla Recycling via Blind Reset: A Cross-Platform Study on Superconducting and Trapped-Ion Processors

arXiv
Authors: Sangkeum Lee

Year

2026

Paper ID

39153

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

149

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Ancilla reuse in repeated syndrome extraction couples reset quality to logical-cycle latency. We evaluate blind reset - unitary-only recycling via scaled sequence replay - on IQM Garnet, Rigetti Ankaa-3, and IonQ under matched seeds, sequence lengths, and shot budgets. Using ancilla cleanliness F_clean=P(|0>), per-cycle latency, and a distance-3 repetition-code logical-error proxy, platform-calibrated simulation identifies candidate regions where blind reset cuts cycle latency by up to 38x under NVQLink-class feedback overhead while maintaining F_clean >= 0.86 for L <= 6. Hardware experiments on IQM Garnet confirm blind-reset cleanliness >= 0.84 at L=8 (1024 shots, seed 42); platform-calibrated simulation for Rigetti Ankaa-3 predicts comparable performance. Architecture-dependent crossover lengths are L* 12 (IQM), 11 (Rigetti), 1 (IonQ), and 78 with GPU-linked external feedback. Two added analyses tighten deployment boundaries: a T1/T2 sensitivity map identifies coherence-ratio regimes, and error-bound validation confirms measured cleanliness remains consistent with the predicted diagnostic envelope. A deployment decision matrix translates these results into backend-specific policy selection.

Paper Tools

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Compare Add to Reading List

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #39153 #39128 Decoder Dependence in Surface-C... #39095 Majorana-XYZ subsystem code

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.