Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance
Majorana-XYZ subsystem code
arXiv
Authors: Tobias Busse, Lauri Toikka
Year
2026
Paper ID
39095
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
231
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present a new type of a quantum error correction code, termed Majorana-XYZ code, where the logical quantum information scales macroscopically yet is protected by topologically non-trivial degrees of freedom. It is a $[n,k,g,d]$ subsystem code with $n=L^2$ physical qubits, $k= \lfloor L/2 \rfloor$ logical qubits, $g \sim L^2$ gauge qubits, and distance $d = L$. The physical check operations, i.e. the measurements needed to obtain the error syndrome, are $3$-local and nearest-neighbour. The code detects every 1- and 2-qubit error, and every error of weight 3 and higher (constrained by the distance) that is not a product of the 3-qubit check operations, however, these products act only on the gauge qubits leaving the code space invariant. The undetected weight-3 and higher operators are confined to the gauge group and do not affect logical information. While the code does not have local stabiliser generators, the logical qubits cannot be modified locally by an undetectable error, and in this sense the Majorana-XYZ code combines notions of both topological and local gauge codes while providing a macroscopic number of topological logical qubits. Taken as a non-gauge stabiliser code we can encode $k \sim L^2 - 3L$ logical qubits into $L^2$ physical qubits; however, the check operators then become weight $2L$. The code is derived from an experimentally promising system of Majorana fermions on the honeycomb lattice with only nearest-neighbour interactions.
Paper Tools
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.