!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Quantum Simulation
Approximate Error Correction for Quantum Simulations of SU(2) Lattice Gauge Theories
arXiv
Authors: Zachary P. Bradshaw
Year
2026
Paper ID
39112
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
144
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present a protocol for actively suppressing Gauss law violations in quantum simulations of SU(2) lattice gauge theory. The protocol uses mid-circuit measurements to extract a characterization of the gauge-violation sector at each lattice vertex, resolving both the total angular momentum and magnetic quantum numbers of the violation via a group quantum Fourier transform. Syndrome-conditional recovery operations map the state back to the gauge-invariant subspace through an iterative sweep over vertices, a procedure we call gauge cooling. We show that while the Knill-Laflamme conditions are not generically satisfied at vertices with nontrivial singlet multiplicity, every single-qubit error is detected by the gauge syndrome. We demonstrate gauge cooling on a single-plaquette simulation of the Kogut-Susskind Hamiltonian truncated to the spin-1/2 representation under depolarizing and amplitude damping noise, showing that the protocol restores gauge invariance and improves fidelity at noise rates representative of current superconducting hardware.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present a protocol for actively suppressing Gauss law violations in quantum simulations of SU(2) lattice gauge theory.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.