Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Simulation Quantum Foundations

Ether of Orbifolds

arXiv
Authors: Henry Lamm

Year

2026

Paper ID

38955

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

126

Citations

0

Abstract

Whose world is this? The orbifold lattice has been proposed as a bridge to practical quantum simulation of Yang--Mills theory, claiming exponential speedup over all known approaches. Through analytical derivations, Monte Carlo simulation, and explicit circuit construction, we identify compounding hidden costs entirely absent in Kogut--Susskind formulations: a mass-dependent Trotter overhead that scales as m4, gauge-violating dynamics that grow as m2 and worsen with penalty terms, and a mandatory mass extrapolation. Monte Carlo simulations of SU(3) establish a universal scaling: the continuum limit forces m2 propto 1/a, binding the Trotter step to the lattice spacing through a cost unique to orbifolds. For a fiducial 103 calculation, the orbifold is 104--1010 times more expensive than every published alternative. The bridge is not built. The gap is the foundation.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Whose world is this?

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #38955 #68474 Concentration-Free Quantum Kern... #68471 von Neumann measurement and qua... #68467 Hong-Ou-Mandel interference of ... #68466 Uncloneable Encryption from Dec...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-11 13:47:29

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.