Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Trotter Scars: Trotter Error Suppression in Quantum Simulation
arXiv
Authors: Bozhen Zhou, Qi Zhao, Pan Zhang
Year
2026
Paper ID
38928
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
154
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that Trotter errors are highly initial-state dependent and that standard upper bounds often substantially overestimate them. However, the mechanism underlying anomalously small Trotter errors and a systematic route to identifying error-resilient states remain unclear. Using interaction-picture perturbation theory, we derive an analytical expression for the leading-order Trotter error in the eigenbasis of the Hamiltonian. Our analysis shows that initial states supported on spectrally commensurate energy ladders exhibit strongly suppressed error growth together with persistent Loschmidt revivals. We refer to such states as Trotter scars. To identify such states in practice, we further introduce a general variational framework for finding error-minimizing initial states for a given Hamiltonian. Applying this framework to several spin models, we find optimized states whose spectral support and dynamical behavior agree with the perturbative prediction. Our results reveal the spectral origin of Trotter-error resilience and provide a practical strategy for discovering error-resilient states in digital quantum simulation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Recent studies have shown that Trotter errors are highly initial-state dependent and that standard upper bounds often substantially overestimate them.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.