Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Optimality of meta-converse for channel simulation
arXiv
Authors: Aadil Oufkir, Omar Fawzi, Mario Berta
Year
2024
Paper ID
38254
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
131
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We study the effect of shared non-signaling correlations for the problem of simulating a channel using noiseless communication in the one-shot setting. For classical channels, we show how to round any non-signaling-assisted simulation strategy--which corresponds to the natural linear programming meta-converse for channel simulation--to a strategy that only uses shared randomness. For quantum channels, we round any non-signaling-assisted simulation strategy to a strategy that only uses shared entanglement. Our main result is for classical and classical-quantum channels, for which we employ ideas from approximation algorithms to give a guarantee on the ratio of success probabilities of at least \(1-e-1\). We further show this ratio to be optimal for the purely classical case. It can be improved to \(1-t-1\) using O\(ln ln(t\)) additional bits of communication.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We study the effect of shared non-signaling correlations for the problem of simulating a channel using noiseless communication in the one-shot setting.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.