Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Simulation
Analog simulation of noisy quantum circuits
arXiv
Authors: Etienne Granet, Kévin Hémery, Henrik Dreyer
Year
2024
Paper ID
38228
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
112
Citations
N/A
Abstract
It is well-known that simulating quantum circuits with low but non-zero hardware noise is more difficult than without noise. It requires either to perform density matrix simulations (coming with a space overhead) or to sample over "quantum trajectories" where Kraus operators are inserted randomly (coming with a runtime overhead). We propose a simulation technique based on a representation of hardware noise in terms of trajectories generated by operators that remain close to identity at low noise. This representation significantly reduces the variance over the quantum trajectories, speeding up noisy simulations by factors around 10 to 100. As a by-product, we provide a formula to factorize multiple-Pauli channels into a concatenation of single Pauli channels.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- It is well-known that simulating quantum circuits with low but non-zero hardware noise is more difficult than without noise.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.