Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Machine Learning Quantum Simulation Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance

The Role of Community Building and Education as Key Pillar of Institutionalizing Responsible Quantum

arXiv
Authors: Sanjay Vishwakarma, Vishal Sharathchandra Bajpe, Ryan Mandelbaum, Yuri Kobayashi, Olivia Lanes, Mira Luca Wolf-Bauwens

Year

2024

Paper ID

37975

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

156

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Quantum computing is an emerging technology whose positive and negative impacts on society are not yet fully known. As government, individuals, institutions, and corporations fund and develop this technology, they must ensure that they anticipate its impacts, prepare for its consequences, and steer its development in such a way that it enables the most good and prevents the most harm. However, individual stakeholders are not equipped to fully anticipate these consequences on their own it requires a diverse community that is well-informed about quantum computing and its impacts. Collaborations and community-building across domains incorporating a variety of viewpoints, especially those from stakeholders most likely to be harmed, are fundamental pillars of developing and deploying quantum computing responsibly. This paper reviews responsible quantum computing proposals and literature, highlights the challenges in implementing these, and presents strategies developed at IBM aimed at building a diverse community of users and stakeholders to support the responsible development of this technology.

Paper Tools

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #37975 #63303 Quantum Radon Transform and Its... #63360 Green's functions for reflectio... #63358 Casimir densities induced by a ... #63348 Machine classification for prob...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.