Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum State Preparation Representation
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Near-Optimal Quantum Algorithm for Finding the Longest Common Substring between Run-Length Encoded Strings
arXiv
Authors: Tzu-Ching Lee, Han-Hsuan Lin
Year
2024
Paper ID
37856
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
163
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We give a near-optimal quantum algorithm for the longest common substring (LCS) problem between two run-length encoded (RLE) strings, with the assumption that the prefix-sums of the run-lengths are given. Our algorithm costs {mathcal{O}}\(n2/3/d1/6-o(1\)cdotpolylog\({n}\)) time, while the query lower bound for the problem is Ω\(n2/3/d1/6\), where n and {n} are the encoded and decoded length of the inputs, respectively, and d is the encoded length of the LCS. We justify the use of prefix-sum oracles for two reasons. First, we note that creating the prefix-sum oracle only incurs a constant overhead in the RLE compression. Second, we show that, without the oracles, there is a Ω\(n/log2n\) lower bound on the quantum query complexity of finding the LCS given two RLE strings due to a reduction of mathsf{PARITY} to the problem. With a small modification, our algorithm also solves the longest repeated substring problem for an RLE string.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We give a near-optimal quantum algorithm for the longest common substring (LCS) problem between two run-length encoded (RLE) strings, with the assumption that the prefix-sums...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.