Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation

Self-similar phase diagram of the Fibonacci-driven quantum Ising model

arXiv
Authors: Harald Schmid, Yang Peng, Gil Refael, Felix von Oppen

Year

2024

Paper ID

37741

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

93

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We study a stroboscopic quantum Ising model with Fibonacci dynamics. Focusing on boundary spin correlation functions in long but finite chains, our simulations as well as analytical arguments reveal a self-similar phase diagram exhibiting regions with Majorana zero modes (MZM) as well as Majorana golden-ratio modes (MGM). We identify the self-similarity transform which governs the evolution of the phase diagram with increasing simulation time. Integrability-breaking perturbations lead to a temporal decay of the boundary spin correlations, ultimaltely limiting the self-similarity of the phase diagram. Our predictions are testable with current quantum information processors.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We study a stroboscopic quantum Ising model with Fibonacci dynamics.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #37741 #78846 Analog quantum simulation of Sh... #78810 Secure Quantum Handshakes: Quan... #78802 Quantum Co-Design of Inhomogene... #78801 Constructing Large and Structur...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.