Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Quantum Simulation
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
New MiniBooNE excess interpretation using Pseudo-Hermitian neutrino oscillation
arXiv
Authors: M. L. Abdelali, N. Mebarki, B. Boutaghane, M. Trirat
Year
2024
Paper ID
37615
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
164
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The excess observed in the MiniBooNE experiment data has been confirmed by several data-releases and analysis. And several attempts to explain such excess are proposed in the litterature using approaches ranging from experimental error to new neutrino theories. None of the attempts seem to fully account for the observed excess. In this paper, we present a new approach this case using a non standard two flavor oscillation theory. In recent years, there is a raising interest in the pseudo-hermitian hamiltonian theories and their impact on several quantum phenomena. The neutrino oscillation is modified using the approach of PT-pseudo hermitian oscillation by having zero-distance effect and asymmetry of the probability of appearance of specific flavors. Such effects can account according to this study for the excess and has a better fit to the data than the best found fit in the standard oscillation framework. We present in this paper the study of the fit of MiniBooNE data the this new oscillation model and its premise.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The excess observed in the MiniBooNE experiment data has been confirmed by several data-releases and analysis.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.