Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Generalized fusions of photonic quantum states using static linear optics
arXiv
Authors: Frank Schmidt, Peter van Loock
Year
2024
Paper ID
37614
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
114
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Using numerical simulations, we explore generalized fusion measurements, extending them in three key ways. We incorporate ancilla-boosting and code-boosting to optimize fusion measurements, which may, but do not necessarily, correspond to Bell measurements. For ancilla-boosting beyond Bell measurements, we identify a hierarchy of fusion efficiencies involving up to four single-photon ancillas. From this numerical evidence, we conjecture the efficiencies for a larger number of single-photon ancillas. Interestingly, our findings suggest that achieving unit efficiency is impossible without utilizing entangled ancilla states. Additionally, in the context of code-boosting, we present an example of a global measurement that surpasses the best-known, via transversal Bell measurements achievable efficiency for a small instance of the quantum parity code.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Using numerical simulations, we explore generalized fusion measurements, extending them in three key ways.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.