Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Foundations

A time (anti)symmetric approach to the double solution theory

arXiv
Authors: Pierre Jamet, Aurélien Drezet

Year

2024

Paper ID

37469

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

98

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In this work we present a new theoretical approach to interpreting and reproducing quantum mechanics using trajectory-guided wavelets. Inspired by the 1925 work of Louis de Broglie, we demonstrate that pulses composed of a difference between a retarded wave and an advanced wave (known as antisymmetric waves) are capable of following quantum trajectories predicted by de Broglie-Bohm theory (also known as Bohmian mechanics). Our theory reproduces the main results of orthodox quantum mechanics and, unlike Bohmian theory, is local in the Bell sense. We show that this is linked to the superdeterminism and past-future (anti)symmetry of our theory.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In this work we present a new theoretical approach to interpreting and reproducing quantum mechanics using trajectory-guided wavelets.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #37469 #69985 From Meta Idea to Advanced Math... #69984 Efficient and SPAM-Robust Ansat... #69955 Efficient Verification of Entan... #69953 Bell inequalities tailored to o...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.