Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Simulation

On the Kostant-Souriau prequantization of scalar fields with polysymplectic structures

arXiv
Authors: Tom McClain

Year

2024

Paper ID

37117

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

105

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In this paper, I present a novel, purely differential geometric approach to the quantization of scalar fields, with a special focus on the familiar case of Minkowski spacetimes. This approach is based on using the natural geometric structures of polysymplectic Hamiltonian field theory to produce an analog of the Kostant-Souriau prequantization map familiar from geometric quantization. I show that while the resulting operators are quite different from those of canonical quantum field theory, the approach is nonetheless able to reproduce a few of canonical quantum field theory's most fundamental results. I finish by elaborating the current limitations of this approach and briefly discussing future prospects.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In this paper, I present a novel, purely differential geometric approach to the quantization of scalar fields, with a special focus on the familiar case of Minkowski spacetimes.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #37117 #78846 Analog quantum simulation of Sh... #78810 Secure Quantum Handshakes: Quan... #78802 Quantum Co-Design of Inhomogene... #78801 Constructing Large and Structur...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.