Quick Navigation
Topics
Superconducting Qubits
Quantum Simulation
Double-target BEC atomtronic rotation sensor
arXiv
Authors: Oluwatobi Adeniji, Charles Henry, Stephen Thomas, Robert Colson Sapp, Anish Goyal, Charles W. Clark, Mark Edwards
Year
2024
Paper ID
36941
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
186
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present a proof-of-concept design for an atomtronic rotation sensor consisting of an array of "double-target" Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs). A "target" BEC is a disk-shaped condensate surrounded by a concentric ring-shaped condensate. A "double-target" BEC is two adjacent target BECs whose ring condensates partially overlap. The sensor consists of an ntimes m array of these double-target BECs. The measurement of the frame rotation speed, ΩR, is carried out by creating the array of double-target BECs (setup step), inducing one unit of quantized flow in the top ring of each member of the array (initialization step), applying potential barriers in the overlap region of each member (measurement step), and observing whether the induced flow is transferred from the top to the bottom ring in each member (readout step). We describe a set of simulations showing that a single instance of a double-target BEC behaves in a way that enables the efficient operation of an ntimes m array for measuring ΩR. As an example of sensor operation we present a simulation showing that a 2times2 array can be designed to measure ΩR in a user-specified range.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present a proof-of-concept design for an atomtronic rotation sensor consisting of an array of "double-target" Bose-Einstein condensates (BECs).
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.