Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Quantum Simulation
Subtle Nuances between Quantum and Classical regimes
arXiv
Authors: Karin Wittmann Wilsmann, Erick R. Castro, Itzhak Roditi, Angela Foerster, Jorge G. Hirsch
Year
2024
Paper ID
36889
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
88
Citations
N/A
Abstract
This study explores the semiclassical limit of an integrable-chaotic bosonic many-body quantum system, providing nuanced insights into its behavior. We examine classical-quantum correspondences across different interaction regimes of bosons in a triple-well potential, ranging from the integrable to the self-trapping regime, and including the chaotic one. The close resemblance between the phase-space mean projections of classical trajectories and those of Husimi distributions evokes the Principle of Uniform Semiclassical Condensation (PUSC) of Wigner functions of eigenstates. Notably, the resulting figures also exhibit patterns reminiscent of Jason Gallas's "shrimp" shapes.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2024 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- This study explores the semiclassical limit of an integrable-chaotic bosonic many-body quantum system, providing nuanced insights into its behavior.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.