Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation

Expected values for SUSY hierarchies of Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian

arXiv
Authors: İsmail Burak Ateş, Şengül Kuru, Javier Negro, Ege Özkan

Year

2025

Paper ID

36572

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

92

Citations

0

Abstract

The aim of this letter is to compute the evolution of some expected values, such as the field operators apm, quadratures and atomic inversion, under SUSY partner Hamiltonians associated to the Jaynes-Cummings Hamiltonian of quantum optics. This kind of SUSY partners are characterized by having spectra which differ in a finite number of energy levels. We wish to elucidate if the partner connection has any influence on these expected values. In particular, we want also to know in which way the classical and revival times are affected by such SUSY partners.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The aim of this letter is to compute the evolution of some expected values, such as the field operators a^pm, quadratures and atomic inversion, under SUSY partner Hamiltonians...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #36572 #78846 Analog quantum simulation of Sh... #78810 Secure Quantum Handshakes: Quan... #78802 Quantum Co-Design of Inhomogene... #78801 Constructing Large and Structur...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-10-30 00:19:30

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.